Does your subject qualify? Notability and what editors look for
Wikipedia does not host pages simply because someone wants one. A subject must be notable, meaning it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Press releases, your own website, social media profiles, paid placements, and trivial mentions do not count. A page about a person or company with no such coverage will almost certainly be declined or deleted, regardless of who wrote it. We tell you which side of the line you fall on.
That is why we assess first. We search for independent coverage such as news reporting, books, academic references, and reviews, then tell you plainly whether a viable article exists. If the evidence is thin, we say so and suggest what might change that, such as earning legitimate press coverage. We would rather lose a sale than take your money for a page that cannot survive review. Honest advice protects your reputation.
Neutral tone, citations and how a compliant draft is written
Wikipedia articles are written in a neutral, encyclopedic voice. There is no marketing language, no adjectives like leading or innovative, and no claims unsupported by a citation. Every significant statement links to a published source. Your writer follows these rules strictly, because promotional drafts are the fastest way to get an article rejected and the subject's name associated with spam. This is why a neutral article often serves a subject better than a glowing one that gets removed within days. A page that survives scrutiny is worth far more than one that attracts a deletion notice and an unflattering discussion thread.
Drafts are usually structured with a short lead summary, a clearly sourced history or biography, and sections that reflect what independent sources actually say, including criticism where reliable sources report it. You may find the neutrality uncomfortable at first. It is also what makes an article credible and likely to stay. You review the draft for factual accuracy, but you cannot dictate the wording of claims the sources do not support.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure, review and realistic timelines
If you or your company are the subject, or you pay someone to write about it, Wikipedia requires disclosure. Paid editing must be declared under the Wikimedia terms of use, and we follow the community's conflict-of-interest guidance. In practice, we usually submit a draft through the Articles for Creation process rather than publishing directly, so volunteer reviewers can assess it openly. We will never hide who is paying for the work.
Review can take anywhere from a few weeks to a few months, and the outcome is not ours to control. Reviewers may accept the draft, ask for changes, or decline it. We handle reasonable feedback and revisions, and we tell you honestly if a page is unlikely to be accepted. We do not offer guarantees of approval, and we do not use fake accounts, bribery, or any practice that violates Wikipedia policy.
How We Run A Wikipedia Writing Project
- 1
Notability assessment
We search for significant independent coverage and report what exists. You get a candid yes, no, or not yet, with reasons and any gaps noted.
- 2
Source gathering
If the subject qualifies, we compile reliable references such as news articles, books, and journals, and discard anything that editors would not accept as independent.
- 3
Neutral draft
Your writer produces an encyclopedic article with citations, in correct Wikipedia formatting. You review it for factual errors but not for promotional emphasis. in the format.
- 4
Disclosed submission
The draft is submitted with proper paid-editing disclosure. We respond to reviewer comments and report the outcome to you, whether accepted or declined. either way.
Who This Service Is For
Established professionals
Authors, academics, artists, and public figures with real press coverage who have never had a page and cannot ethically or practically write one themselves. and artists.
Companies with media coverage
Businesses that have been covered in independent publications and want an accurate, neutral company page rather than a promotional one that editors would remove. in print.
Authors and creators of notable works
Writers whose books or projects have received reviews and coverage can sometimes support an article about the work, separate from any page about themselves. of note.